Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islands of Insight
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. as additional sources to establish notability have been located and added to the article. Liz Read! Talk! 20:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Islands of Insight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. No meaningful content, no notability, fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. Not even a release date. Even if it is ever notable, this would be WP:TOOSOON. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Per WP:SURMOUNTABLE. Passes GNG with these sources: [1] [2] [3] therefore it should have a standalone article. Simply being a stub is an insufficient reason to delete a page as there are countless stubs on Wikipedia. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep There are plenty of sources proving notability, here and in the article. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.